Certified Nursing Assistant free essay sample

The Road Not Taken Essay examples -- Literary Analysis, Robert Frost

Robert Frost’s â€Å"The Road Not Taken† has contacted the hearts of individuals all over America and has legitimately earned its place in the American scholarly standard. Written in 1916 by probably the best writer in American history; Robert Frost utilizes a remarkable metrical structure that breathes life into nature and a gives the peruser a firm comprehension of the provincial way of life. Propelled by his companion Edward Thomas, Robert Frost’s â€Å"The Road Not Taken† sets a man in opposition to two ways for which a troublesome decision must be made. After that man settles on his decision he tells the peruser â€Å"Two streets wandered in a wood, and I†I took the one less went by, and that has made all the difference† (Frost). The man doesn't uncover whether he settled on the correct decision; all he tells the peruser is that his decision had a critical effect on his life. For quite a long time, different scholarly pundits have dissecte d this bit of composing attempting to reveal its actual importance. Numerous researchers have seen this piece as a genuinely uplifting work while others have envisioned it simply an amusing story of good and bad. Alexander Meiklejohn is one researcher who utilized Robert Frost’s sonnet to show others settling on the correct decisions. Katherine Kearns, then again, feels that the sonnet doesn't satisfy its ubiquity. The perspectives and reactions with respect to this one of a kind bit of writing stretch far and wide, demonstrating that Robert Frost’s sonnet has charmed perusers for quite a long time. An enormous volume of reactions have developed that offer new points of view for perusers to investigate as they keep on perusing â€Å"The Road Not Taken† for a considerable length of time to come. Alexander Meiklejohn saw Frost’s sonnet as a genuinely persuasive work. Meiklejohn was a thinker and knowledgeable educator. His perspectives on life refl... ...terpretations of the story will shift. Robert Faggen makes this analysis a stride further and relates the sonnet to Charles Darwin’s hypothesis of advancement and how species developed by settling on troublesome decisions through their reality. Karen Kearns speaks to those pundits who don't feel emphatically about Robert Frost’s sonnet. In spite of the fact that numerous pundits can concur Robert Frost’s sonnet represents different degrees of incongruity; Kearns thinks that its unexpected that â€Å"The Road not Taken†, an average sonnet, best case scenario, is being viewed as one of the most mainstream sonnets in the American artistic group. The reactions for this sonnet will never end insofar as individuals keep on settling on troublesome decisions in their lives. Subsequent to perusing the â€Å"The Road not Taken,† one can shape their own reactions about what way is directly for them; regardless of whether it implies taking the street twisted in the undergrowth or setting out and about not taken.

How to Use Gmat Argumentative Essay Samples

How to Use Gmat Argumentative Essay SamplesGmat argumentative essay samples are the most popular resource for writing papers at universities all over the world. When students and professors do their research on the Internet, they find that these papers are among the most popular choices. This is a good thing for students to know.If you are not using these Gmat arguments in your Gmat essay, then you are losing out on a huge source of material. You should really try to utilize as much of the Gmat resources as possible in your writing. There are so many different types of things you can say about certain subjects and ideas in this area of study. If you are not including arguments in your essay, then you are really not exploring all of the good things that you can say in this topic.The basic structure of a Gmat argument is very similar to the structure of a conventional argument. It is the execution of the argument and the flow of the argument that is different between the two. For examp le, if you use an argument in a Gmat essay, then the other person or the reader needs to follow the argument that you are making.When writing this kind of essay, you have to get the other person thinking and willing to agree with you. However, there are ways to make the argument more convincing than usual. These arguments that you include should provide a counter argument and challenge to the author's position.Another important part of these arguments is to use your logic. You should be able to present it in such a way that it makes sense. To help this along, you can use examples from the subject matter and make the argument more concrete. You can also go into great detail about the benefits of different methods.Once you have a good set of specific examples that you can use, then you can move onto the most important step of these arguments, which is to get your point across in the clearest way possible. You need to be able to convince the reader. A lot of people are interested in th e information that you are trying to present so you need to make sure that you use them in the right way.Finally, you need to make sure that you finish off with a thesis statement. You can use this statement as a summary of the information that you have presented. You do not want to leave out any parts of the information because they will make the conclusion too vague.Using Gmat argumentative essay samples is an excellent way to improve your writing skills. Because these are so popular, you will always find one that you can use. If you use one that is well written, then you will be able to write high quality essays for your students.

How to Write Narrative Paragraphs in English

Narrative paragraphs are often used to describe what a person does over a period of time. Read this example narrative paragraph, notice how words like later are used to connect what happens. Yesterday evening I got home from work at 6 oclock. My wife had painstakingly prepared a delicious  dinner which we ate immediately. After I had cleaned up the kitchen, we watched TV show which had been recommended by my friend. Then, we got dolled up for a night on the town. Our friends arrived at about 9 oclock and we chatted for a while. Later, we decided to visit a local jazz club and listen to some bebop for a while. The mad musicians really blew their horns. We really enjoyed ourselves and stayed late only leaving after the band had played their final audacious set.   Tips on Tenses Use the  simple past for succession of events: Narrate with the simple past tense when events follow each other. here are some examples. Notice that each event occurs in succession. I got up and went to the kitchen. I opened the door and looked into the fridge.She arrived in Dallas, took a cab, and checked in to her hotel. Next, she had some dinner in a restaurant. Finally, she visited a colleague before she went to bed. Use the  past continuous for interrupted actions: To express that an action is interrupted, use the past continuous to describe what was happening when there was an interruption. Use the past simple with the action that interrupts what was happening. Finally, as we were discussing the issue, the teacher walked into the classroom. Obviously, we stopped talking immediately.Sharon was working in the garden when the telephone rang. Use the  past perfect for previous actions: To express something that was finished before another event in the past, use the past perfect. This is especially useful when providing an explanation for what happened. We decided to go out and celebrate because we had just finished remodeling our home.Janet didnt join us for dinner as she had already eaten. Use the  past perfect continuous for the length of actions: The past perfect continuous is used to express how long something had been happening up to a point in time in the past. We had been hiking for more than ten hours and it was time to call it a day.She had been nagging him for months to get a better job when he finally was hired. Linking Language Starting sentences with a time expression: Start sentences with linking phrases such as Then, Next, Finally, Before that, etc. to connect sentences and show time relationships in your narrative writing.   First, we flew to New York on our great adventure. After New York, we moved on to Philadelphia. Then, it was on to Florida for some scuba diving.After breakfast, I spent a few hours reading the newspaper. Next, I played softball with my son.   Use time clauses to show relationships in time: Use before, after, as soon as, etc. to introduce a time clause. Pay special attention to the use of tenses with time clauses. Begin a sentence with a time clause, but use a comma before the main clause. OR Begin with the main clause and end with the time clause using no comma. After we had finished our homework, we watched a funny movie.They attended a meeting as soon as they arrived in Chicago.   Descriptive Language   When writing a narration, its a good idea to include descriptive language to help readers get a feeling for what happened. Here are some suggestions on how to make your writing more descriptive. Use adjectives to modify nouns. Nothing is more boring than a sentence such as  We went to the store.  Its easy to modify  store  to be more precise as well as descriptive.  We went to a big box electronics store  is much more interesting.   They bought a car. - They bought a used red Italian car.She planted a tree. - She planted a young oak tree. Use prepositional phrases such as in the corner  and  across from the bank  to give an idea of where something happens, as well as the relationships between objects. After we arrived, we were shown to our table at the back of the restaurant.The car was parked around the corner on the other side of the street.   Use relative clauses to further describe and provide information about important details in your narration. After that, we enjoyed a tasty glass of wine which was grown locally.Next, we took the car which we had rented in Los Angeles and drove to San Francisco.   Written Exercise - Using Past Verbs and Prepositions Write out the following sentences on to a piece of paper to form a paragraph based on the narrative paragraph above. Conjugate each verb in the past and provide the correct prepositions. Yesterday evening Jack _____ (get) home _____ (preposition) half past five.He immediately _____ (make) himself a cup _____ (preposition) coffee and _____ (sit down) to read a book.He _____ (read) the book _____ (preposition) half past seven.Then, he _____ (make) dinner and _____ (get ready) to go out with his friends.When his friends _____ (arrive), they _____ (decide) to go out to see a film.He _____ (stay out) until midnight with his friends.Finally, he _____ (fall) asleep _____ (preposition) about one oclock. Written Exercise - Making Your Writing More Interesting Rewrite the following sentences using descriptive language to spice up your writing.   After that, the man went home.  Later, we drove to a restaurant.  He had finished the report before I gave the presentation.  The children attended the class.My friends asked for help.   Adding Linking Language Exercise Now that you have a good feeling for the form of a narrative paragraph. Fill in the gaps in this paragraph providing appropriate linking language to complete the paragraph. _________ I drove my rusty old car to visit my best friend. _______ I arrived, he had done his best to prepare a tasty meal. ________, we took a long walk through the park next to his home. __________ we had been out for more than an hour, my friend asked me if I could keep a secret. _________, I swore not to tell anyone anything. _________ he recounted a wild tale of a crazy night out on the town __________. ________, he told me he had met the woman of his dreams and that they were to get married ___________. Imagine my surprise!

Effects Of The 1996 Welfare Reform Essay - 1488 Words

The effects of the 1996 welfare reform bill helped declined caseloads on the social and economic well-being of fragile families, single mothers, and children. Although, the welfare reform was documented for making several positive changes such as reducing poverty rates, lowering the out of-wedlock childbearing, and formulated a better family structure, it is undeniable that poverty remained high among single mothers and their children. The reality of the matter was that most welfare recipients experienced serious barriers to maintain a stable employment due to their lack of skills, not having anyone available to take care of their young children when they leave for work as well as not gaining long-time employment with decent pay to help foster the family. As a result, most poor women and children were faced with the instability of economic and social future as welfare eligibility exhausted their efforts of supporting their families. The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996 ended America’s largest cash assistance program, which was the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). It was replaced with the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), which emphasized work, personal responsibility, economic self-sufficiency and strong families. This was created in an effort to help minimized the use of welfare by low income mothers. As a result, these low income mothers could no longer receive cash aid until further notice,Show MoreRelatedEssay about Hcr 230 Week 3 Assignment the Welfare Reform Act1018 Words   |  5 PagesThe Welfare Reform Act HCR/230—Claims Prep II Jeana Timmcke University of Phoenix—Axia College The Welfare Reform Act Welfare has been a controversial issue since the 1960s, and continues to be a controversial issue. During the late 1980s, citizens were calling for reform of the Welfare System. Due to citizen concern the Personal Responsibility, Welfare and Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) came into effectRead MoreWelfare Is A Government Program1111 Words   |  5 PagesWelfare is a government program that provides financial aid to families or individuals who cannot provide for themselves. Welfare helps pay for poor people’s necessities such as food, housing, and medical care. Welfare is a program that is needed in the world, because some people don’t know how to be independent and take care of themselves. Social Welfare began after the Great Depression occurred. The Great Depression caused several families to become unemployed during and following this timeRead MoreThe Issue Of Drug Testing Welfare Recipients And Applicants1231 Words   |  5 Pagesexplore the pros and c ons on the issue of drug testing welfare recipients and applicants. The journals and articles used to determine whether drug testing is necessary or a hindrance to public assistance applicants, recipients and the government vary in their argument on the effects of those who receive assistance. The study, completed by Anderson, Shannon, Schyb and Goldstein (2002) determined that, due to the change in Welfare reform in 1996, the disruption of benefits increased the risk homelessnessRead MoreThe Reforms Of Public Benefits For Needy Families1476 Words   |  6 PagesThe Reforms of public benefits for needy families in the U.S. and specifically single mothers, which took place in August of 1996, was an important step since its inception with FDR in 1935. Many requirements were imposed onto public benefits eligibility, such as work and income requirement and establishing a time limit for public aid. Effects of the reform were hard to ignore as it resulted in decreasing governmental expen diture and heavy program caseloads. However, the big debate about public benefitsRead MoreFlat Broke with Children: Women in the Age of Welfare Reform Essay examples1127 Words   |  5 PagesChildren: Women in the Age of Welfare Reform by Sharon Hays. In the book, the author looks at the welfare reform act enacted in 1996, known as the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. . She examines both the positive and negative effects that the Act has had on the poor as well as the effects it has had on society overall. In her research, she spent over 600 hours in welfare offices, speaking to caseworkers, social workers, and welfare recipients and potential recipientsRead MoreEffects of Welfare Reform on Illicit Drug Use Essay1463 Words   |  6 Pagesbeen conducted to analyze the effects welfare reform has had on its intended purposes such as employment, caseloads, or familial cohesion. And while there have been a few studies that examined the correlation between women receiving welfare and drug use, the effects of reform in regards to illicit drug use, specifically women, had not been previously evaluated. As legislation passed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) in 1996, the intended objective was toRead MoreWelfare: The Governments Failure Essay1330 Words   |  6 Pagesdollars into welfare but, ironically, the poverty rate is higher than when they started (Tanner, Welfare Reform). This outrageous amount of money proves that welfare will lead Unite d States into debt. The original intent of current welfare benefits has failed; therefore the national welfare system must be reformed. To fully understand how to reform the welfare system Americans must know what the history of welfare is, illegitimate births’ obvious connection to crime and welfare, how welfare has failedRead MorePoverty Essay1286 Words   |  6 Pageshigher ups have failed to address the issue correctly. One of the main policies or programs when dealing with poverty is the highly debated subject of welfare and welfare reform. Welfare is a procedure that was created in order to benefit the wellbeing of those who are less fortunate or live in poverty and cannot afford basic necessities. Welfare is a controversial topic as it is seen by some to promote laziness and non working. While on the other hand people believe that it is vital as an economicRead MoreWelfare: A Hammock to a Trampoline Essay1658 Words   |  7 Pagesgoal of welfare is to help individu als afford the basic necessities of life, however, it has become apparent that throughout the generations people have become too comfortable and secure being on welfare and thus are not striving for self-sufficiency. As with all government run programs there is a budget for welfare services, and with more and more people applying for welfare and fewer returning to self-sufficiency there is simply not enough money to go around. Putting time limits on welfare is a hotRead MoreWelfare to Work: Does It Really Benefit Single Parents? Essay961 Words   |  4 PagesWelfare to Work: Does It Really Benefit Single Parents? When President Clinton signed the Personal Responsible Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act in August of 1996, it ended welfare as we know it. Under this reform, wages and earnings replaced welfare, but many critics felt only problems arose from this program. Welfare to work forces poor and single parents into jobs that do not supply sufficient living wages (Albelda 1). These single parents can never work enough hours to support their families

Definition of ‘affirmative action’ free essay sample

According to the definition given by Webster’s New World Dictionary, affirmative action is the concept which corrects the effects of discrimination in the education or employment of people of certain minority groups. Affirmative action is really meant to abolish all kinds of discrimination in education and employment places so that people belonging to all race, ethnicities and groups experience equal and impartial opportunities and consideration in their educational institutions and employment places. â€Å"Affirmative action was designed to give qualified minorities a chance to compete on equal footing with Whites† (Chappell, 1995) Affirmative action is really meant to establish equality even though it later (upon implementation) resulted into more discrimination. Certain places where affirmative action was implemented it brought about serious favoritism towards certain groups while establishing equal opportunities. Historical background of ‘affirmative action’ An Executive Order 11246 was issued by President Lyndon B. Johnson asking all the federal contractors to implement affirmative action to raise the number of employees they recruit from the minority group. President also formed the Office or Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) which did a good research on Affirmative action to locate its exact meaning and intention. This order required employers with government contracts a category that includes most major corporations as well as many small businesses, banks and other financial institutions, and colleges and universities to have affirmative-action programs Debate points Does affirmative action is really helpful in ending the discrimination in work places? Does it contribute for equal opportunity in work place or does it produced only reverse discrimination? Thesis statement The interest groups who are the minorities insist affirmative action is needed to reduce employment discrimination. They provide factual data which shows current circumstance of employment discrimination. On the other hand, the opponents to affirmative actions contend this principle cause reverse discrimination. The negatively privileged minority in United States are quite happy with the implementation of affirmative action as they are over privileged in the education and employment fields because of the affirmative action. Let us assume these supporters of affirmative action as Group A. Group A is constituted by the black minorities (African Americans and other minority black groups). Women also come under this group. There is another group, Group B with a different opinion. They are of the opinion that even though affirmative action is really meant to establish equality it later (upon implementation) resulted into more discrimination. Certain places where affirmative action was implemented it brought about serious favoritism towards certain groups while establishing equal opportunities. Group B is constituted by the majority whites, politicians and other groups who are not satisfied with the implementation of affirmative action. Group A is happy with the outcome of affirmative action as it helped them to attain a better hold in employment and educational arenas. They would never have achieved this if there had been nothing likes affirmative action. According to Group A Affirmative action is good decision to strive for equality, indiscrimination and inclusiveness. They argue that is really an insurance measure to guarantee that the best person (qualified and talented) would receive first consideration in job and educational matters. They consider affirmative action as the best method to eliminate discrimination and problems. For them Affirmative action is the one and only panacea for all the discrimination problems in America. Group A constituted by black minorities give the testimony about their status in the nation. They say that the white institutions are found to be reluctant to serve people of color (non-white minority).  These institutions function on the basis of race and operate on the policy of segregation. They are of the opinion that institutional racism is followed in all organizations, public bodies, educational institutions (universities) and corporations. They are sadly testifying that institutional racism influences almost all policies, processes and policies (in both governmental and public institutions). According to group A, educational institutions give preference to superior people in the case of admissions. In universities and colleges, ethnicity and racial status also matters for the selection of students. Applicants belonging to our race are given least preference in providing jobs also. They say that people belonging to superior race were getting high preference in all governmental and non-governmental dealings before the introduction of affirmative action. They say they are often denied justice during court matters also. Law enforcement officers would not show much interest on their complaints it seems. Group A considers affirmative action as a real boon to them as they feel more privileged through it. They say that affirmative action has equalized the opportunities of blacks and whites. They are against the argument of Group B that affirmative action creates favoritism. Supporters of affirmative action argue that it is really a boon to the disadvantaged section that represents the disadvantaged backgrounds. They argue that such people should be given consideration as their heritage has suffered from numerous kinds of discriminations (Women’s Answer to Special Preferences Not All Affirmative). People who support affirmative action include the African Americans, Latinos, Hispanics, Indians, Black Caribbean’s, Asians, Native Hawaiian, Other Pacific Islanders, American Indians or Alaska Native Black African, and women belonging to the negatively privileged group. They constitute the interest groups who think that affirmative action has been successful in eliminating employment discrimination. Politicians, minority ethnic groups and other underprivileged people are happy with the outcome of affirmative action. The interest group supporting affirmative gives the following arguments. They say that affirmative action is good for all candidates by compromising for the existing racism. According to them, the diverse student body (whites + black) makes a better learning environment (mixed environment). For them affirmative action is a good action that would level the field for both groups. They say that affirmative action do not makes any discrimination and it eliminates preferential treatment by inclusion. These interest groups say that affirmative action would compensate for all the biases present in certain institutions and standardized tests. Women are extremely happy with affirmative action as they enjoy much privilege through it. The status of women had increased significantly because of affirmative action (according to these particular interest groups). The percentage of women-owned business has increased by 57% since 1982. Value Claims of African Americans, Hispanics, Blacks and other Groups Ÿ Affirmative action is essential to guarantee people of color, minorities, and women equality in employment and education. Race- and gender-inclusive policies turn tax consumers into tax producers. A diversified corporate America is better able to compete in this increasingly globalized economy. Let us not be misled: Increasing the educational and employment opportunities for a majority of Americans is good for the nation and good for our future. ŸÂ   America believe that affirmative action is at the root of our economic distress, but The real culprits are NAFTA [North American Free Trade Agreement] and GATT [General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade]destructive economic policies that have sent our jobs across the border and overseas to cheaper labor markets, leaving our plants closed, without a plan to retrain our workers and invest in our economic future. ŸÂ   Affirmative action does not mandate reverse discrimination. These policies merely require women and people of color to be included in the applicant pools of universities, workplaces, and unions. If an unqualified applicant is hired or promoted over a qualified one in the name of diversity, this is discrimination, and it is actionable in court just as it is under all other circumstances Group B however says that affirmative action was found to be multifaceted and was vaguely defined. They say that it is a quote-based system intended for various minority sections. However, affirmative action is yet to accomplish its original purpose or intention of establishing a society which never discriminates any person on the ground of his or her race or ethnic identity. The goal of equality intended by affirmative action did not cross its infant stage. The politicians in group B say that affirmative action which blindly tries to help black people is that it violates 14th Amendment of the Constitution and the Civil Rights laws. It is said that these kind of special privileges disturb the level playing field and invite preferential treatment on understanding non-white minorities because of the color of their skin. Group B says that affirmative action has invited long debates and continued tension alone and is no longer applicable. But after few years of its implementation, it was found was it was just a partial, temporary and defective remedy for a society that is marginalized and highly disenfranchised for centuries. Group B says that affirmative action did not restructure society to bring equality and instead accelerated the discrimination problems and invited the problem of reverse racism also. According to them, affirmative action stigmatized and underestimated the credentials of the actually qualified minorities (Matthew, 1996). Affirmative action devalued or underestimated their talent and qualification. Since the qualifications, character, and culture of non-white people were always in question in United States, special racial categories or privileges (quota) really created a doubt in the Group B whether these people are really qualified for this position or are they present there because of the special racial privilege that is assigned to them. Group B says that affirmative action programs encouraged the recruitment of unqualified people. Group B argues that because of the strict implementation of affirmative action, talented people belonging to other race are not given equal opportunity in the required fields. For example if there exists one vacancy in a particular office and if more than one people belonging to different races are present, it would be difficult to determine to whom the post should be given. According to the affirmative action, the post should be offered to the person belonging to the inferior race and others can be given only a second consideration. It is however an open fact that every job need the best person to perform it. Qualification, talent and abilities make a candidate appropriate for a particular post. They ask how a job can be offered to a person because of his color when several other who are suitable for the job have applied. They wonder how unfair it will be if the application of the suitable most candidates is rejected. They ask how this discrimination would finally lead to equality. Group B strongly argue that affirmative action programs brought the problem of reverse discrimination in several places. For example, certain male applicants who were really qualified were denied jobs as the first consideration was given to woman applicants and other applicants who belong to minorities. This is also a serious kind of discrimination as the applications of the deserved candidates were declined. This kind of reverse discrimination has appeared in the American society and has lead to the declining of the quality of officials in various offices. Offices and companies have hired people of minority group who occupy the seat only because they were preferred in the selection processes. Politician supporters of Group B say that quotas are not only unfair, but extremely expensive for our economy.  The State Department has studied and concluded that affirmative action is very much complicated as assigning quotas is highly discriminative. The state department has hired large number of people from the minorities group by lowering the recruitment standards for equalizing the work force. The result was that white people who received high percentages were not selected and instead black people who had just passed their examination were given offer letters. This eventually affected the quality of the work force. All these resulted again into the problems of reverse discrimination (Kevin, 1995). The interest groups who oppose affirmative action include whites, men and others who were not happy with the extra privilege affirmative action gives to females and blacks. The quota rule troubles institutions and other recruitment boards as they are often compelled to recruit based on the quota system. This does not allow them to recruit the right people. Their arguments against affirmative action are that Affirmative action results in discrimination based upon race and skin color. They say that affirmative action never result in true diversity. Men argue that it is absolutely unfair to judge candidates on the basis of gender. Whites say that race should not be criteria for employment. Value claims of Men, whites and others who oppose affirmative action According to a gallop poll taken in 1995 July (Roberts 1995), most of the Americans opine that affirmative action is no more useful. According to Roberts (1995), a Gallup Poll taken in July of 1995 shows that Americans agree that quotas are no longer useful.  Americans oppose employment quotas by a margin of 63% to 35% and 68% opposed and 22% in the backward community  favored quotas (Roberts, 1995, p. 23).   People of America today are not interested in quota system as it did not implement what it really intended. According to Roberts, it is â€Å"as temporary bootstrap measures to help blacks advance faster† (Roberts Stratton, 1995, p. 41). As long as the State Department has its problems with quotas, economy growth becomes stagnant.  An article in the National Review (1993) said that â€Å"in 1991 the direct and indirect cost of quotasamounted to between $112 and $115 billion.   While the opportunity costamounted to at least 4 percent of 1991 GNP (Counting Cost, 1993, p. 18).†Ã‚   The government itself had to experience the ill effects of Affirmative Action in few cases. Congress researched the student loan defaults all in all the states. Their reply to the issue was to stop the funding of federal loans to colleges whose students tended to default.   However, historically black colleges and universities are exempted,creating a minority right to default (Roberts Stratton, 1995, p. 44).   Here it would be fun to note that both black and white tax payers have to pay for these defaulted loans given to these colleges. Catherine Yang says in Business Week that says that affirmative action programs are no longer good to America.  Yang states that â€Å"the US market and labor pool is increasingly diverse-so a companys workforce must reflect that diversity to succeed† (Yang,1996,p.51). The whites who oppose affirmative action says that affirmative action has replaced discrimination against women and minorities with discrimination against white menreverse discrimination. Even though the equal employment opportunity sound good in principle, in practice they have come to conceal equally unjust, equally harmful, and probably unconstitutional practices that give preference to some at the expense of others. Moreover, the Preferential policies have added fuel to racial tensions by incurring the resentment of those not in protected groups, those who are expected to pay the costs of reparation despite never having engaged in discriminatory practices themselves. Conclusion As far as I read my sources, both groups of people have each own reason and truth to support their opinion. In my opinion, we have to grasp the situation and effectiveness of affirmative action, and then we can change the policy little bit. According to me, both these groups are wrong in their perceptions. Facts show that affirmative action has not made much difference in the discrimination prevailing in America. Facts prove that African Americans represent 12.4%, and Latinos represent 9.5%. Yet in the labor market: followings. Moreover, 69% of all doctors are white men, 22% are white women, 4% are Black, and only 5% are Latino. Seventy percent of all lawyers are white men, 24% are white women, 3% are Black, and 3% are Latino. In Texas alone, 81% of all CEOs, executives, and business managers are white, 11% are Latino, 6% are Black, while Asians and other minorities make up only 2%. Although job interviews are a well-established management prerogative, research has shown that they are notoriously unreliable predictors of successful choices. Even at entry level, most individuals who make hiring decisions are white males; the higher the job level, the more this is likely to be the case. Apart from this, the pay differential between white men, white women, and people of color persists. In 1993, for every dollar a white man earned, an African American man made 74 cents, a white woman 70 cents, a Latino man 64 cents, an African American woman 63 cents, and a Latina 54 cents. Moreover, the Urban Institute has documented the rampant nature of discrimination in the workplace. Sending equally qualified African Americans and whites to apply for the same jobs, they found that in nearly a quarter of the cases, whites moved further through the hiring process than blacks. The institute likewise found that whites received 33 percent more of the interviews and 52 percent more job offers than equally qualified Latinos. Even when African Americans and Latinos are hired, they are promoted and paid less. Unlike both these groups believe affirmative action has not made much change in America. equal opportunity for the blacks who are the chief most goal of affirmative action is still a dream in various colleges and job places. Non-white students still find difficulty in getting admission and they are also found to be subjected to discrimination in certain fields. Affirmative action has not brought any significant progress in equality and non-white business owners still find no progress any progress compared to the white groups. Moreover, unemployment rate is very much prevalent in black population even though affirmative action is said to be upholding them. Black people are also found to work in low quality work environments and are mostly given low-paying labor intensive jobs. According to Chappell â€Å"Few can argue that racism is still rampant in awarding contracts, jobs, and educational opportunities, even though it’s been proven beneficial to have people of different races with different ideas and different experiences working toward the same goal† (Chappell, 1995). Black minorities are still negatively privileged compared their white counterparts in all the major fields. The job chances for black people are still bleak though not completely hopeless. All this makes us doubt whether affirmative action has served its purpose. It is time to realize that in real life, the legacy of unfairness is not always so tidy and affirmative action contributed very little to solve these problems. Factual claims prove that both these groups are wrong in their opinion. However it is very obvious affirmative action has failed completely and has not served its purpose. It just initiated some unwanted arguments and problems. â€Å"A Question of Fairness† Ladies Home Jorunal, March 1996, p 17-20. Boston, Thomas. â€Å"Ready, Aim, Fire† Black Enterprise. March 1996, p 24. Chappell, Kevin. â€Å"What They Don’t Tell You About Affirmative Action† Ebony August 1995, p 6-12. â€Å"Clinton’s Focus on Diversity† U.S. News and World Report. March 20, 1995, p. 42. Cooper, Matthew. â€Å"Affirmative Action on Ever-Thinning Ice.† American Enterprise, Janurary/February 1996, p. 27-33. Dundul, Tom. â€Å"Affirmative Action.† Working Women, October 1995, p 39-43. Lavery, Mark. â€Å"Down but Not Out.† Black Enterprise, September 1995, p15. Lubman, Sarah â€Å"Campus Admissions† Wall Street Journal, May 16, p81. Rilland, Ralph. â€Å"The Jobs of the Future†. Pittsburg Business Times, April 1996, p72-81. â€Å"Women’s Answer to Special Preferences Not All Affirmative† Business Journal, May 1995, p6.

Merchant Of Venice By William Shakespeare Essays - Italian Films

Merchant Of Venice By William Shakespeare In the Dukes opinion (Act iv, Sc.1) Shylock is an inhuman wretch.? Do you agree? Do you feel that Shylock receives, ?justice? at the end of the play? The Merchant Of Venice was written by William Shakespeare, between 1596 and 1598. It was first published in 1600. Although this play is described as a romantic comedy, there is an underlying plot of moral dimension in the development of Shylocks character. Shylock is a Jew and at this time Jews were the focus of much racial prejudice and repression. In fact the Jewish community in the middle ages suffered huge prejudice. Jews were associated mainly with money lending, as Christians could not lend money at interest to other Christians. Shakespeare's portrayal of Shylock and Tubal is based on common prejudice and ignorance tempered by his own liberal tolerance. This racial prejudice is relevant within the play because is justifies the behaviour of shylock. It is this prejudice that sets the plot and is a major theme within The Merchant Of Venice. Antonio who is supposed to be a hero is portrayed as a self- righteous prig at times. Portia who might be expected to play a timid heiress is in fact shown as a strong-minded woman, and Shylock is represented as a tragic outsider. Shylock is a moneylender. He follows the Jewish religion and has a house in Venice. He lives with his daughter and is a widower. It is not easy to see Shylock as a straightforward villain though, despite the fact that when we first meet him, this is what he appears to be. The Duke calls Shylock an ?inhuman wretch.? The Duke's greeting for Antonio is warm, but he damns Shylock with great forcefulness. What The Duke does here is enforce the audience's views of Shylock. Notwithstanding his jaundiced view of Shylock, the Duke tries to reason with him, and attempts to play upon his feelings of comparison and mercy for a fellow human being. Everybody including Tubal hates Shylock. In Act 3 SC.1, Tubal winds up Shylock about his daughter leaving him for as Christian, and taking the families treasures. Any sympathy that the audience may have for Shylock as a result of his impassioned speech quickly evaporates as they listen to him rail against his daughter. His only concerns are for his Ducats, his jewels and now more ominously, his revenge. ?Thou stick'st a dagger in me. I shall never see my gold again- Fourscore Ducats at a sitting! Fourscore Ducats? This tells us that he is extremely greedy and he has more concerns over his wealth than his own daughter. Is this the act of a human being or of an inhuman wretch? We learn that even Jessica despises her own father. Jessica acquaints us with her unhappiness at home because of her father. The fact that Shylock is a lone figure in the play is underlined by the fact that even his own daughter is ashamed of him. Jessica is ashamed because of the way that Shylock acts towards everyone in the play. As I have said, everyone hates Shylock but even his own daughter does! She describes the house they live in as ?hell'. What we must ask is, what does this suggest about Shylock being a father? If he cannot show any emotion as a father, surely he cannot then be human. Shylock is racist. Even in the opening scenes there is evidence for this. For example in Act 1 Sc.3, shylock thinks to himself: ?I will buy with you, sell with you, talk with you, walk with you, and so following: but I will not eat with you, drink with you, nor pray with you This shows us his true feelings towards the Christians, and hints to us of his bloodthirsty revenge that he longs to take on Antonio. Probably the subtlest view of his racism is when he says: I hat you for you are a Christian.? This surely shows us his true racist feelings deep inside of him. He openly admits to the people he talks to that he hates them because of their religion. Shylock is very cruel; his desire for Antonio's flesh is almost a lust. He shows no mercy for Antonio, it